Olivier: June 11, 2019 Sequence referenced to drawing ISK4585D.dwg at coords [INCH]: x = 169.264" y = 167.267" Olivier: sequence ends on ISK4585D.dwg at coords [INCH]: x = 198.108" y = 152.253" which is the start of ios_db1 Olivier: Referenced to drawing ISK4209d.dwg Quadrupole lengths verified Quadrupole apertures verified Start of sequence is defined at points [in] x = 297.535" y = -64.219" Feb 14 2019 - Quadrupole polarities were backwards. Fixed. Sept 23 2019 - re-referenced to drawings IIS0135D.dwg, IIS0192D.dwg and ILE0173D.dwg Olivier April 2 2020 - I found all EQ's with incorrect lengths. I think this is from all the back and forth with EQSkim. Odd, as we had agreed to put it in. I'll correct the quadrupole lengths in ios_db1.xml, as it's supposed to be the skimmer-less version. I'll add the skimmer EQSkim (later) in ios_db1_skim.xml. IOS:Q1 l = 99.72*mm, effl=48.92*mm Switch ref: IIS0192D.dwg (note backward X-def'l - told Brian). start coords defined at point [in]: x = 42.9013" y = 30.3312" which is midpoint Q2 on IIS0135D.dwg Switch ref: ILE0173D.dwg (note units incorrectly scaled by factor of 2. Div everything by 2). Start coords defined at point [in]: x = -16.054" y = 25.303" which is midpoint Q3 on IIS0192D.dwg FC3 position approximate (410mm) - see ILE0173D.dwg Olivier: regarding IOS:MB, see: http://lin12.triumf.ca/optr/ISAC/OLIS/3head/matlab/sy.f or http://lin12.triumf.ca/optr/ISAC/OLIS/SuperNanogan/sy.f values (from Rick): (SLAC-75 parameters): ak1 = 0.317 ak2 = 2.0 (other parameters): rho = 11.728" (bob's sy.f) fullgap = 5.0800 cm from my computations, taking an effective field boundary of 0.998", I get (Olivier): rho = 29.9887cm = 11.8066 rho*theta(60deg) = 31.4041cm edge angle is 0 both in and out. http://lin12.triumf.ca/optr/ISAC/OLIS/3head/matlab/sy.f Olivier: IOS:FC6 position placeholder to avoid negative drifts. Spencer: EMIT and FC6 from ISK4209.dwg, but swapped their positions as clearly emit is actually before FC6, so locations are approximate. Olivier: IV7 and all attenuators are to be considered approximate. Changes made to IOS attenuators circa 2016 are not encoded in the Ray Dube drawing. This is the OLIS 10x attenuator This is the OLIS 120x attenuator This is the OLIS 210x attenuator This is the OLIS 3400x attenuator Olivier: ordrevB was -156.97mm before Q9, I've modified it's position accordingly - Q9 position changed Sept 23 2019 after re-measure. (Spencer?) Q9 length changed from eletrical length to effective. See: http://lin12.triumf.ca/Optics/Quadrupoles/FFintegrals/ISISACsummary.txt DEPRECATED:**************************** Olivier: end of sequence defined on ISK4209d.dwg at coordinates [inches] x = 260.685" y = -183.743 *************************************** Sequence ends on ILE0173D.dwg at coords [inches]: x = 97.342" y = -0.850 which is the same distance from the midpoint of Q9 from the old deprecated measure above. This is the start of sequence ios_db10.xml Olivier: Drawing referenced ISK4209d.dwg. Quadrupole apertures verified. Bender gap parameters verified. Quadrupole polarity taken from above dwg. From ISK4209d.dwg, the curved line segment within the bender electrode has a length of l = 7.854" = 19.9492cm, which is consistent for all benders in both the IOS:DB10 section and the ILT corner to the RFQ. Thus, the midpoint of the curved segment, at the optical center of the bender path is at l = 3.927" = 9.97458cm from the point at which the curved line begins on the drawing. NOTE: ON ISK4209d.dwg, this sequence starts at (inches): x = 260.685" y = -183.743" which corresponds to the top side of the blue, horizontal, rectangular bar immediately below IOS:Q9, on the drawing. Olivier: this sequence ends on ISK4209d.dwg at coordinates [inches]: x = 291.109" y = -214.168" this point corresponds to the right hand side of the vertical blue rectangle immediately to the left of ILT:Q33. total path length s = 1182.2216mm Olivier: Jan 31 2019, compared some distances to ISK4209d.dwg found several discrepancies. Unclear where some of these were referenced from. Quadrupole optr tags and polarity have been obtained from above source. Update - Feb 14 2019: Quadrupole polarities in ILT seem to have originally been coded in reverse. Polarities have been re-verified against both isk4209d.dwg and Rick's original ilt-ira optr tune at lin12.triumf.ca/optr/ISAC/RFQ_buncher/sy.f Prebuncher remains to be modelled in opera-2D. Remains unclear how to elegantly transition TRANSOPTR from DC to bunched. Will have to get guidance from Rick. For now, I've implemented a triple discrete RFGAP call for the prebuncher. This is useful for longitudinal bunching, however it's unclear if this will do a good job simulating the actual prebuncher. Start of sequence on ISK4209d.dwg is at position [inches] x = 291.109" y = -214.168" Spencer: End of sequence on ISK4209d.dwg is at position [inches] x = 277.9285" y = 207.6593" this is 1.8" downstream of the centre of ILT:Q42. Corresponds to position on ARIEL drawing ART2080.dwg of: x = 1839813.25 mm y = 2189703 mm Note that the units on ART2080.dwg appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. SK 20200228 - I have confirmed all distances in this sequence using ART2080.dwg. All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman: http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf Sequence starts at the downstream (closer to ILT:B433) edge of the ILT:Q42 skimmer Coordinates of that on ART2082.dwg are: X: 1839813.25 mm Y: 2189703.0 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. ! FIT at the start of a periodic section call twissmatch(1,-2.1717,85.424,10.,1) call twissmatch(3,2.1717,85.424,10.,1) Sequence ends at the edge of IGTAE:B1 closer to IGTA:Q18. Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1032298.1875 mm Y: 2334597.25 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. SK 20200228 - I have confirmed all distances in this sequence using ART2080.dwg. All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman: http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf Sequence starts at the edge of IGTAE:B1 closer to IGTA:Q18. Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1032298.1875 mm Y: 2334597.25 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. Sequence ends at the edge of IGTAE:B4 closer to AGTE:Q9. Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1592957.125 mm Y: 2208290.5 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. SK 20200228 - I have confirmed all distances in this sequence using ART2080.dwg. All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman: http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf Sequence starts at the edge of IGTAE:B4 closer to AGTE:Q9. Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1592957.125 mm Y: 2208290.5 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. Sequence ends at the edge of AGTEN:B4 closer to AGTE:Q13. Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1592957.0 mm Y: 2262221.25 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. SK 20200228 - I have confirmed all distances in this sequence using ART2080.dwg. All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman: http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf Sequence starts at the edge of AGTEN:B4 closer to AGTE:Q13. Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1592957.0 mm Y: 2262221.25 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. Sequence ends at the edge of AVTES:B4 closer to AGTE:Q14. Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1592957.25 mm Y: 2275847.0 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. SK 20200212 - I have confirmed all distances in this sequence relative to AVTES:B4 using ART2080.dwg. All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman: http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf Sequence starts at the edge of AVTES:B4 closer to AGTE:Q14. Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1592957.25 mm Y: 2275847.0 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. ! FIT at the start of a low beta insertion call twissmatch(1,0.,24.,10,1) call twissmatch(3,0.,24.,10,1) Sequence ends at the edge of AVTEN:B4 closer to AGTE:Q21. Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1592957.25 mm Y: 2313020.25 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. SK 20200226 - I have confirmed all distances in this sequence using ART2080.dwg. All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman: http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf Sequence starts at the downstream edge of AVTEN:B4 Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1592957.25 mm Y: 2313020.25 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. ! FIT at the start of a low beta insertion call twissmatch(1,2.1717,85.424,1.,1) call twissmatch(3,-2.1717,85.424,1.,1) ! FIT at the start of a periodic section call twissmatch(1,-0.7153,139.8,10.,1) call twissmatch(3,-0.7153,139.8,10.,1) SK 20200226 - RFQ 's' was way off, so I've adjusted it based on design drawing. I've also reduced the length as it was then overlapping with upstream fit statement. RFQ position/lenth should be double checked. call fit(1,2,1,0.,1,1) call fit(1,4,3,0.,1,1) call fit(2,2,6,0.,1,1) SK 20200226 - while checking distances, slid the fit below to remain the same distance from AGTE:Q37. ! FIT at the start of a periodic section call twissmatch(1,0.,40.,1.,1) call twissmatch(3,0.,40.,1.,1) SK 20200226 - while checking distances, reduced PDT length from 950.16 mm to 945.12 mm to avoid overlap with preceding fit statement which would cause negative drifts. SK 20200226 - I **did not** confirm the EL38 effective length. Sequence ends at the downstream edge (closer to EBIS) of AGTC:B1 Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1457596.125 mm Y: 2430017.00 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. SK 20200330 - I have confirmed all distances in this sequence using ART2080.dwg. Sequence starts at the downstream edge (closer to EBIS) of AGTC:B1 Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1457596.125 mm Y: 2430017.00 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. Sequence ends at the marker for 'AGTE EBIS' on ART2080.dwg Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1385565.875 mm Y: 2430016.5 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. SK 20200330 - I have confirmed all distances in this sequence using ART2080.dwg. Sequence starts at the marker for 'AGTE EBIS' on ART2080.dwg Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1385565.875 mm Y: 2430016.5 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. Sequence ends at the upstream edge (closer to EBIS) of the AGTC:B1 as it turns towards the nier. Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1457653.875 mm Y: 2429072.25 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. SK - All optics positions verified 20200210. All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman: http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf 1.0" quads = 25.4 mm electrode => 35.12 mm effective 1.5" quads = 38.1 mm electrode => 47.50 mm effective 2.0" quads = 50.8 mm electrode => 60.59 mm effective Sequence starts at the upstream edge (closer to EBIS) of the AGTC:B1 as it turns towards the nier. Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are (measured using e drawings PRO): X: 1457653.875 mm Y: 2429072.25 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. 36 degree spherical bender, radius 254.0 mm. NIER spectrometer dipole, radius of curvature 360 mm, bend radius 90 degrees SK 20200210. Re-verifying positions based on ART2080, so I slid Q11:match-point forward so it is the same distance from Q11 as it was before, which is 136.288 mm. ! FIT at the start of a periodic section call twissmatch(1,2.1717,85.424,10.,1) call twissmatch(3,-2.1717,85.424,10.,1) ! FIT at the middle of a horizontal bender call fit(1,2,1,0.,10,1) call fit(1,4,3,0.,10,1) call fit(2,2,6,0.,10,1) Sequence ends at the downstream (closer to IGTA:B26) edge of the AGTC:Q28 skimmer Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are (measured using e drawings PRO): X: 1542157.125 mm Y: 2209962.5 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mmthe units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. SK - All optics positions verified 20200903. All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman: http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf Sequence starts at the downstream (closer to IGTA:B26) edge of the AGTC:Q28 skimmer Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are (measured using e drawings PRO): X: 1542157.125 mm Y: 2209962.5 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. Sequence ends at the downstream (closer to AGTS:Q9) edge of AGTC:B36 Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are (measured using e drawings PRO): X: 1560744.5 mm Y: 2138902.75 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. SK - All optics positions verified 20200903. All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman: http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf Sequence starts at the downstream (closer to AGTS:Q9) edge of AGTC:B36 Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are (measured using e drawings PRO): X: 1560744.5 mm Y: 2138902.75 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. Sequence ends at the edge of AGTE:B1 closer to AGTS:Q13. Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are (measured using e drawings PRO): X: 1611544.625 mm Y: 2138902.75 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. SK - All optics positions verified 20200903. All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman: http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf Sequence starts at the edge of AGTE:B1 closer to AGTS:Q13. Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are (measured using e drawings PRO): X: 1611544.625 mm Y: 2138902.75 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. Sequence ends at the downstream (closer to AGTY:B1) edge of the AGTS:Q20 skimmer. Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are (measured using e drawings PRO): X: 1672951.25 mm Y: 2138902.75 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. SK 20200226: All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman: http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf NOTHING ELSE CHECKED. Sequence starts at the downstream (closer to AGTY:B1) edge of the AGTS:Q20 skimmer. Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1672951.25 mm Y: 2138902.75 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. Sequence ends at the downstream (closer to AGTY:Q13) edge of AGTNY:B4. Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1693204.125 mm Y: 2262221.25 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. SK - All optics positions verified 202000226 All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman: http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf Sequence starts at the downstream (closer to AGTY:Q13) edge of AGTNY:B4. Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are: X: 1693204.125 mm Y: 2262221.25 mm Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4. call FIT( 1, 1, 1, 0.000, 10.000, 1) call FIT( 1, 3, 3, 0.000, 10.000, 1)