Olivier: June 11, 2019
Sequence referenced to drawing ISK4585D.dwg at coords [INCH]:
x = 169.264"
y = 167.267"
Olivier: sequence ends on ISK4585D.dwg at coords [INCH]:
x = 198.108"
y = 152.253"
which is the start of ios_db1
Olivier: Referenced to drawing ISK4209d.dwg
Quadrupole lengths verified
Quadrupole apertures verified
Start of sequence is defined at points [in]
x = 297.535"
y = -64.219"
Feb 14 2019 - Quadrupole polarities were backwards.
Fixed.
Sept 23 2019 - re-referenced to drawings IIS0135D.dwg,
IIS0192D.dwg and ILE0173D.dwg
Olivier April 2 2020 - I found all EQ's with incorrect
lengths. I think this is from all the back and forth
with EQSkim. Odd, as we had agreed to put it in. I'll
correct the quadrupole lengths in ios_db1.xml, as it's
supposed to be the skimmer-less version. I'll add the
skimmer EQSkim (later) in ios_db1_skim.xml.
IOS:Q1 l = 99.72*mm, effl=48.92*mm
Switch ref: IIS0192D.dwg (note backward X-def'l - told Brian).
start coords defined at point [in]:
x = 42.9013"
y = 30.3312"
which is midpoint Q2 on IIS0135D.dwg
Switch ref: ILE0173D.dwg (note units incorrectly scaled by factor of 2. Div
everything by 2). Start coords defined at point [in]:
x = -16.054"
y = 25.303"
which is midpoint Q3 on IIS0192D.dwg
FC3 position approximate (410mm) - see ILE0173D.dwg
Olivier: regarding IOS:MB, see:
http://lin12.triumf.ca/optr/ISAC/OLIS/3head/matlab/sy.f
or
http://lin12.triumf.ca/optr/ISAC/OLIS/SuperNanogan/sy.f
values (from Rick):
(SLAC-75 parameters):
ak1 = 0.317
ak2 = 2.0
(other parameters):
rho = 11.728" (bob's sy.f)
fullgap = 5.0800 cm
from my computations, taking an effective field boundary
of 0.998", I get (Olivier):
rho = 29.9887cm = 11.8066
rho*theta(60deg) = 31.4041cm
edge angle is 0 both in and out.
http://lin12.triumf.ca/optr/ISAC/OLIS/3head/matlab/sy.f
Olivier: IOS:FC6 position placeholder to avoid negative drifts.
Spencer: EMIT and FC6 from ISK4209.dwg, but swapped their positions
as clearly emit is actually before FC6, so locations are approximate.
Olivier: IV7 and all attenuators are to be considered
approximate. Changes made to IOS attenuators circa
2016 are not encoded in the Ray Dube drawing.
This is the OLIS 10x attenuator
This is the OLIS 120x attenuator
This is the OLIS 210x attenuator
This is the OLIS 3400x attenuator
Olivier: ordrevB was -156.97mm before Q9, I've modified it's position
accordingly - Q9 position changed Sept 23 2019 after re-measure.
(Spencer?) Q9 length changed from eletrical length to effective. See:
http://lin12.triumf.ca/Optics/Quadrupoles/FFintegrals/ISISACsummary.txt
DEPRECATED:****************************
Olivier: end of sequence defined on ISK4209d.dwg at coordinates [inches]
x = 260.685"
y = -183.743
***************************************
Sequence ends on ILE0173D.dwg at coords [inches]:
x = 97.342"
y = -0.850
which is the same distance from the midpoint of Q9 from the old
deprecated measure above. This is the start of sequence ios_db10.xml
Olivier: Drawing referenced ISK4209d.dwg.
Quadrupole apertures verified.
Bender gap parameters verified.
Quadrupole polarity taken from above dwg.
From ISK4209d.dwg, the curved line segment within the bender
electrode has a length of l = 7.854" = 19.9492cm, which is consistent
for all benders in both the IOS:DB10 section and the ILT corner to the
RFQ.
Thus, the midpoint of the curved segment, at the optical center
of the bender path is at l = 3.927" = 9.97458cm from the point
at which the curved line begins on the drawing.
NOTE: ON ISK4209d.dwg, this sequence starts at (inches):
x = 260.685"
y = -183.743"
which corresponds to the top side of the blue, horizontal,
rectangular bar immediately below IOS:Q9, on the drawing.
Olivier: this sequence ends on ISK4209d.dwg at coordinates [inches]:
x = 291.109"
y = -214.168"
this point corresponds to the right hand side of the vertical blue
rectangle immediately to the left of ILT:Q33.
total path length s = 1182.2216mm
Olivier: Jan 31 2019, compared some distances to ISK4209d.dwg
found several discrepancies. Unclear where some of these were
referenced from.
Quadrupole optr tags and polarity have been obtained from above
source.
Update - Feb 14 2019: Quadrupole polarities in ILT seem to have
originally been coded in reverse. Polarities have been re-verified
against both isk4209d.dwg and Rick's original ilt-ira optr tune
at lin12.triumf.ca/optr/ISAC/RFQ_buncher/sy.f
Prebuncher remains to be modelled in opera-2D. Remains unclear
how to elegantly transition TRANSOPTR from DC to bunched. Will
have to get guidance from Rick.
For now, I've implemented a triple discrete RFGAP call for the
prebuncher. This is useful for longitudinal bunching, however
it's unclear if this will do a good job simulating the actual
prebuncher.
Start of sequence on ISK4209d.dwg is at position [inches]
x = 291.109"
y = -214.168"
Spencer:
End of sequence on ISK4209d.dwg is at position [inches]
x = 277.9285"
y = 207.6593"
this is 1.8" downstream of the centre of ILT:Q42.
Corresponds to position on ARIEL drawing ART2080.dwg of:
x = 1839813.25 mm
y = 2189703 mm
Note that the units on ART2080.dwg appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
SK 20200228 - I have confirmed all distances in this sequence using
ART2080.dwg.
All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman:
http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf
Sequence starts at the downstream (closer to ILT:B433) edge of the ILT:Q42 skimmer
Coordinates of that on ART2082.dwg are:
X: 1839813.25 mm
Y: 2189703.0 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
! FIT at the start of a periodic section
call twissmatch(1,-2.1717,85.424,10.,1)
call twissmatch(3,2.1717,85.424,10.,1)
Sequence ends at the edge of IGTAE:B1 closer to IGTA:Q18.
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1032298.1875 mm
Y: 2334597.25 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
SK 20200228 - I have confirmed all distances in this sequence using
ART2080.dwg.
All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman:
http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf
Sequence starts at the edge of IGTAE:B1 closer to IGTA:Q18.
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1032298.1875 mm
Y: 2334597.25 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
Sequence ends at the edge of IGTAE:B4 closer to AGTE:Q9.
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1592957.125 mm
Y: 2208290.5 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
SK 20200228 - I have confirmed all distances in this sequence using
ART2080.dwg.
All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman:
http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf
Sequence starts at the edge of IGTAE:B4 closer to AGTE:Q9.
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1592957.125 mm
Y: 2208290.5 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
Sequence ends at the edge of AGTEN:B4 closer to AGTE:Q13.
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1592957.0 mm
Y: 2262221.25 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
SK 20200228 - I have confirmed all distances in this sequence using
ART2080.dwg.
All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman:
http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf
Sequence starts at the edge of AGTEN:B4 closer to AGTE:Q13.
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1592957.0 mm
Y: 2262221.25 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
Sequence ends at the edge of AVTES:B4 closer to AGTE:Q14.
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1592957.25 mm
Y: 2275847.0 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
SK 20200212 - I have confirmed all distances in this sequence relative to
AVTES:B4 using ART2080.dwg.
All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman:
http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf
Sequence starts at the edge of AVTES:B4 closer to AGTE:Q14.
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1592957.25 mm
Y: 2275847.0 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
! FIT at the start of a low beta insertion
call twissmatch(1,0.,24.,10,1)
call twissmatch(3,0.,24.,10,1)
Sequence ends at the edge of AVTEN:B4 closer to AGTE:Q21.
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1592957.25 mm
Y: 2313020.25 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
SK 20200226 - I have confirmed all distances in this sequence using ART2080.dwg.
All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman:
http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf
Sequence starts at the downstream edge of AVTEN:B4
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1592957.25 mm
Y: 2313020.25 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
! FIT at the start of a low beta insertion
call twissmatch(1,2.1717,85.424,1.,1)
call twissmatch(3,-2.1717,85.424,1.,1)
! FIT at the start of a periodic section
call twissmatch(1,-0.7153,139.8,10.,1)
call twissmatch(3,-0.7153,139.8,10.,1)
SK 20200226 - RFQ 's' was way off, so I've adjusted it based on design drawing.
I've also reduced the length as it was then overlapping with upstream fit
statement. RFQ position/lenth should be double checked.
call fit(1,2,1,0.,1,1)
call fit(1,4,3,0.,1,1)
call fit(2,2,6,0.,1,1)
SK 20200226 - while checking distances, slid the fit below to remain the same
distance from AGTE:Q37.
! FIT at the start of a periodic section
call twissmatch(1,0.,40.,1.,1)
call twissmatch(3,0.,40.,1.,1)
SK 20200226 - while checking distances, reduced PDT length from 950.16 mm
to 945.12 mm to avoid overlap with preceding fit statement which would cause
negative drifts.
SK 20200226 - I **did not** confirm the EL38 effective length.
Sequence ends at the downstream edge (closer to EBIS) of AGTC:B1
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1457596.125 mm
Y: 2430017.00 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
SK 20200330 - I have confirmed all distances in this sequence using ART2080.dwg.
Sequence starts at the downstream edge (closer to EBIS) of AGTC:B1
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1457596.125 mm
Y: 2430017.00 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
Sequence ends at the marker for 'AGTE EBIS' on ART2080.dwg
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1385565.875 mm
Y: 2430016.5 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
SK 20200330 - I have confirmed all distances in this sequence using ART2080.dwg.
Sequence starts at the marker for 'AGTE EBIS' on ART2080.dwg
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1385565.875 mm
Y: 2430016.5 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
Sequence ends at the upstream edge (closer to EBIS) of the AGTC:B1 as it turns towards the nier.
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1457653.875 mm
Y: 2429072.25 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
SK - All optics positions verified 20200210.
All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman:
http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf
1.0" quads = 25.4 mm electrode => 35.12 mm effective
1.5" quads = 38.1 mm electrode => 47.50 mm effective
2.0" quads = 50.8 mm electrode => 60.59 mm effective
Sequence starts at the upstream edge (closer to EBIS) of the AGTC:B1 as it
turns towards the nier.
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are (measured using e drawings PRO):
X: 1457653.875 mm
Y: 2429072.25 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
36 degree spherical bender, radius 254.0 mm.
NIER spectrometer dipole, radius of curvature 360 mm, bend radius 90 degrees
SK 20200210. Re-verifying positions based on ART2080, so I slid Q11:match-point forward so it is
the same distance from Q11 as it was before, which is 136.288 mm.
! FIT at the start of a periodic section
call twissmatch(1,2.1717,85.424,10.,1)
call twissmatch(3,-2.1717,85.424,10.,1)
! FIT at the middle of a horizontal bender
call fit(1,2,1,0.,10,1)
call fit(1,4,3,0.,10,1)
call fit(2,2,6,0.,10,1)
Sequence ends at the downstream (closer to IGTA:B26) edge of the AGTC:Q28 skimmer
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are (measured using e drawings PRO):
X: 1542157.125 mm
Y: 2209962.5 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual
distance in mmthe units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
SK - All optics positions verified 20200903.
All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman:
http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf
Sequence starts at the downstream (closer to IGTA:B26) edge of the AGTC:Q28 skimmer
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are (measured using e drawings PRO):
X: 1542157.125 mm
Y: 2209962.5 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
Sequence ends at the downstream (closer to AGTS:Q9) edge of AGTC:B36
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are (measured using e drawings PRO):
X: 1560744.5 mm
Y: 2138902.75 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual
distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
SK - All optics positions verified 20200903.
All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman:
http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf
Sequence starts at the downstream (closer to AGTS:Q9) edge of AGTC:B36
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are (measured using e drawings PRO):
X: 1560744.5 mm
Y: 2138902.75 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
Sequence ends at the edge of AGTE:B1 closer to AGTS:Q13.
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are (measured using e drawings PRO):
X: 1611544.625 mm
Y: 2138902.75 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual
distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
SK - All optics positions verified 20200903.
All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman:
http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf
Sequence starts at the edge of AGTE:B1 closer to AGTS:Q13.
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are (measured using e drawings PRO):
X: 1611544.625 mm
Y: 2138902.75 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
Sequence ends at the downstream (closer to AGTY:B1) edge of the AGTS:Q20 skimmer.
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are (measured using e drawings PRO):
X: 1672951.25 mm
Y: 2138902.75 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual
distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
SK 20200226:
All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman:
http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf
NOTHING ELSE CHECKED.
Sequence starts at the downstream (closer to AGTY:B1) edge of the AGTS:Q20 skimmer.
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1672951.25 mm
Y: 2138902.75 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
Sequence ends at the downstream (closer to AGTY:Q13) edge of AGTNY:B4.
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1693204.125 mm
Y: 2262221.25 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an actual
distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
SK - All optics positions verified 202000226
All quad effective lengths confirmed based on TRI-BN-19-22 by Rick Baartman:
http://lin12.triumf.ca/text/design_notes/b2019_22/note.pdf
Sequence starts at the downstream (closer to AGTY:Q13) edge of AGTNY:B4.
Coordinates of that on ART2080.dwg are:
X: 1693204.125 mm
Y: 2262221.25 mm
Note that the units on this drawing appear to be messed up. To get an
actual distance in mm the units given on drawing need to be divided by 25.4.
call FIT( 1, 1, 1, 0.000, 10.000, 1)
call FIT( 1, 3, 3, 0.000, 10.000, 1)